A special survey conducted by the research company Gradus on November 25, 2025, among 1,000 respondents aged 18–60 records broad skepticism and rejection of the 28-point Trump peace plan. The findings also show that, against the backdrop of growing diplomatic pressure on Kyiv, Ukrainians continue to consolidate around key domestic institutions.

Trust in President Volodymyr Zelensky has reversed its previous downward trend and increased to 21%, bringing the head of state back into the top three institutions with the highest support. The Armed Forces of Ukraine remain the leading institution with 57%, followed by volunteer organisations at 28%. This dynamic shows that when political leadership faces external pressure, society tends to reinforce the institutions associated with defence and national resilience.

The peace plan, which entered active public discussion late last week, quickly became one of the central topics for Ukrainians. Two-thirds of respondents (66%) are aware of the negotiations and follow developments. Another 20% are informed but not closely engaged.

When assessing the plan as a whole, a significant share of respondents (43%) consider it unacceptable for Ukraine. One third sees a mix of acceptable and unacceptable provisions.

However, the picture becomes clearer when respondents evaluate concrete proposals. An overwhelming majority of Ukrainians reject the idea of de-facto recognition of occupied territories as Russian, limitations on the size of the Armed Forces, dual oversight of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, full amnesty for Russian war criminals, and the comprehensive reintegration of Russia into the global economy. These elements are widely perceived as incompatible with sovereignty, security and justice.

At the same time, elements aimed at strengthening security and restoring political normalcy receive a more favourable response. These include security guarantees from Western partners, the possibility of holding elections shortly after signing a potential agreement, and reaffirming Ukraine’s non-nuclear status.

Scepticism regarding the plan’s viability in its current version dominates public sentiment. Most respondents (68%) doubt it can deliver lasting peace, while 72% view the likelihood of its signing as low. Even if an agreement were to be concluded, many expect only a short-term halt in hostilities followed by a quick resumption of the war.

“Ukrainians assess any peace proposal not through emotion but through the lens of long-term security. They are willing to consider specific points that align with the country’s strategic interests, while clearly rejecting anything that undermines sovereignty or legitimises the consequences of aggression. We see a high level of awareness, sober analysis and a realistic understanding of risks,” comments Evgeniya Blyznyuk, sociologist, CEO & Founder of Gradus.

Overall, the findings show that Ukrainian society closely monitors shifts in the international context, resists hasty compromises, supports domestic institutions in moments of external pressure, and demonstrates a mature stance on the prospects of peace.

The survey was conducted by Gradus via self-administered questionnaires in the Gradus mobile app. The sample reflects the structure of the urban population (50,000+ residents) aged 18–60 by gender, age, city size and region, excluding temporarily occupied territories and areas of active hostilities. Fieldwork took place on November 25, 2025. Sample size: 1,000 respondents.